Partner, Ian Robinson, said, “The ECHR ruling in case of Bogdan Bărbulescu could shape the extent to which firms can monitor employees’ private communications”. The court ruling says that not only must a company policy inform employees that they reserve the right to monitor employee emails, but they must also let employees know when they are doing so.
The case in question related to a Romanian man fired 10 years ago for using a company Yahoo messaging account to contact his family. The company had presented Mr Bărbulescu with printouts of his private messages to his brother and fiancée on Yahoo Messenger as evidence of his breach of a company ban on such personal use. He had previously told his employer in writing that he had only used the service for professional purposes.
Although local courts found nothing wrong with the company’s decision to terminate the employee, the European court found that Mr Bărbulescu’s private correspondence could not be intercepted because his company had not given prior notice that it was monitoring his communications.
This ruling comes after European data privacy authorities ruled that bosses may not sift through workers’ social media accounts unless for narrowly-defined, work-related purposes. In a guidance statement, they indicated that “Employers should not assume that merely because an individual’s social media profile is publicly available they are then allowed to process those data for their own purposes. A legal ground is required for this processing, such as legitimate interest.”
Although the ruling has no direct effect in British or EU law, experts say that it will establish a significant precedent in the evolution of digital privacy rules at work.
Ian, comments “Companies need to review their office manuals and IT policies and practices as a matter of urgency in light of this ruling”.
If you would like assistance in relation to an employment matter, call partner Andrew Bryan on 023 9282 0747 for further information.